Framework to measure success as a Leader

PS: This content is generated with the help of AI to document my thought process and future reference.

Measuring success as a leader, especially in engineering, requires a mix of quantitative outcomes and qualitative signals across people, product, and process. You’re successful not just when things ship, but when your team thrives, your org scales, and your vision sustains without micromanagement.


🧭 1. Success in People Leadership

βœ… Indicators:

  • Retention & Engagement: Low regrettable attrition, high eNPS/survey scores.
  • Growth & Promotions: Team members getting promoted or stretching into larger roles.
  • Team Health: Psychological safety, collaboration, visible trust and accountability.
  • Feedback Culture: You give and receive feedback regularly, and it changes behavior.

πŸ” How to Measure:

  • 1:1s with action follow-through
  • Engagement survey results (e.g., CultureAmp)
  • Promotion readiness conversations
  • Peer and upward feedback

πŸ—οΈ 2. Success in Product & Technical Outcomes

βœ… Indicators:

  • Shipping Value: Team consistently delivers customer-impactful features.
  • Technical Quality: Tech debt is manageable, incidents are rare and well-handled.
  • Innovation: Team takes initiative and experiments where appropriate.

πŸ” How to Measure:

  • DORA metrics (lead time, deployment frequency, MTTR, etc.)
  • OKR achievement rates
  • Roadmap delivery and tradeoff communication quality
  • Customer/PM feedback

πŸ”„ 3. Success in Process and Execution

βœ… Indicators:

  • Predictability: Your team delivers what they commit to.
  • Simplicity: Processes reduce friction instead of adding it.
  • Velocity with Quality: You ship often without creating rework or burnout.

πŸ” How to Measure:

  • Sprint/scope completion trends
  • Cycle time / PR metrics
  • Incident response quality and trendlines
  • Team feedback on process effectiveness

🌱 4. Success in Strategic Impact and Influence

βœ… Indicators:

  • Cross-functional Trust: PMs, designers, other teams rely on you and your team.
  • Org Impact: You influence beyond your immediate team (e.g., hiring, architecture).
  • Delegation & Scaling: Your team operates effectively even when you’re not involved.

πŸ” How to Measure:

  • Number of dependencies handled effectively
  • Invitations to strategic planning or company-level discussions
  • Number of problems solved without escalation
  • Mentoring impact across the org

🧠 5. Success in Self-Awareness and Growth

βœ… Indicators:

  • Self-regulation: You model calm, deliberate thinking under pressure.
  • Learning Orientation: You seek feedback and evolve.
  • Vision: Your leadership has a point of view that’s consistent and inspires.

πŸ” How to Measure:

  • Manager/mentor feedback
  • How your perspective influences others
  • Your ability to grow successors

πŸ“Š Optional: Leadership Scorecard

DomainKey MetricExample
Team healtheNPS or attrition>85% retention rate
DeliveryOKR completion>70% of KRs met
QualityIncidents or bugsMTTR < 1hr, bug reopen rate < 5%
InfluenceStrategic contributionsLed 2+ org-wide initiatives
GrowthPromotions from team2 engineers promoted in last 12 months

Ultimately, the real test is: Does your team get better over time, even without you in the room?

Would you like a Notion/Google Doc version of this to track your own leadership performance over time?

Example of Scorecard

Here’s a practical Leadership Scorecard template you can track over time using Notion (or Google Docs/Sheets, if you prefer). It’s structured around key leadership dimensions, with space to track metrics, outcomes, and reflection over each quarter.


πŸ—‚ Leadership Scorecard Template (Quarterly Review)


πŸ”Ή General Info

FieldValue
Name[Your Name]
Review PeriodQ2 2025
Manager/Reviewer[Your Manager]
Team(s) Managed[Team Name(s)]

1. People Leadership

Metric / SignalGoal / TargetActualNotes / Reflection
Retentionβ‰₯ 90%95%One departure due to personal relocation
eNPS or engagement scoreβ‰₯ 7072Areas to improve: recognition, async collaboration
Promotions / Growth Milestones1+ engineer promoted2One senior promotion, one scope increase
1:1 Cadence and Follow-throughWeekly / Biweeklyβœ…Always conducted, with action items tracked in Notion
Peer / Upward FeedbackCollect at least 33Positive feedback on trust and transparency

2. Product & Technical Outcomes

MetricGoalActualNotes / Reflection
OKR Completion Rateβ‰₯ 70%75%One stretch KR missed; strong feature impact
Delivery ConsistencyHit sprint goals >80%82%Improved planning helped
Incidents or Critical Bugs< 21Incident RCA well-handled and improved alerting
Tech Debt / Refactoring1 major cleanup doneβœ…Removed legacy GraphQL service

3. Process and Execution

MetricGoalActualNotes / Reflection
Cycle Time (PRs)< 24h median22hSetup async review slots in team calendar
Unplanned Work Ratio< 15% of sprint scope10%More clarity in backlog grooming
Incident Response Quality<1hr MTTR45minTriage playbook followed consistently
Engineering Health Check (Pulse)Qualitative feedbackπŸ‘“Process feels light and effective” from team

4. Strategic Impact and Influence

SignalEvidenceNotes / Reflection
Initiatives Led[e.g., CI/CD Migration, Hiring Process Revamp]2 initiatives β€” both completed
Mentoring Impact[Mentee promoted? Leading new project?]Mentored Sr Dev to lead Q3 delivery
Org Collaboration[Cross-team OKRs, alignment]Partnered with PM org on shared roadmap
Recognition or Trust Earned[Invited to planning, consulted on decisions]Asked to present team process at eng-wide sync

5. Self-Reflection and Growth

QuestionAnswer
What did I do well this quarter?Strengthened team clarity and delivery rhythm
What could I have done better?Improve speed of difficult feedback delivery
What feedback did I receive and how did I act on it?More delegation β†’ did it via tech lead assignments
What are my growth goals for next quarter?Facilitate career pathing convos with all ICs

πŸ“ Optional: Scoring System (for internal use)

You can give yourself a 1–5 score for each domain and track trends over time:

DimensionScore (1–5)Notes
People Leadership4Good growth + engagement
Product/Tech Outcomes4Strong delivery, slight KR miss
Process/Execution5Excellent cycle time and delivery rate
Strategic Influence3Needs more proactive cross-org push
Self-Growth4Solid reflection and adaptation